Thursday, May 27, 2021

The Commonalities on Race as well as Education That's Hiding in Plain Sight

The latest skirmishes in education’s never-ending culture wars—the tussles about critical race theory, “anti-racist” education, and diversity, equity, and inclusion in the classroom—can be dispiriting. I’ve got friends and colleagues on both sides of these battles, who hold positions that are both heartfelt and hardening. I am not naïve enough to believe that they are likely to declare a truce anytime soon. Nor do I have any particular wisdom about the perfect way to address these sensitive issues.

Still, I believe that common ground is there to be found, if not between the hard-liners on either side, then at least among parents and educators out there in the real world of kids and classrooms. I also believe that a great many Americans yearn to occupy such ground. After a crippling pandemic and way too much partisan warfare, so many of us long to get back to working together to help all students make progress. Here are five promising and praiseworthy practices that I believe most of us could get behind, regardless of our politics or our views on other issues, while doing a lot of good for millions of kids.

1. The adoption and implementation of “culturally-affirming” instructional materials. The label is new, but the idea is not: Kids should be able to see themselves and their cultures in the books that they read. Mostly that’s about making sure the canon is inclusive and diverse, with authors and characters that represent America’s diversity. The good news is that several of the best English language arts programs already do this quite well, especially EL Education, which is purposefully inclusive of Black, White, Hispanic, Asian-American, and Native American themes, authors, and characters, and gets all greens from EdReports. But we should keep getting better at this so that all children feel like they’re valued as part of the great American story. High-quality professional learning is going to be an essential accompaniment to the materials.

2. The effort to diversify the education profession. This is simply common sense, especially because of the large demographic gulf between our student population and our educator corps. Everyone benefits from teacher diversity. It’s a shame that ed schools have made such little progress making it happen. It’s particularly important for students of color, especially Black students, given the growing research evidence demonstrating the positive impact on such children in having the opportunity to take classes from teachers of the same race. As we at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute found in a recent study by scholar Seth Gershenson, this may be one reason that urban charter schools outperform their district counterparts. They are simply better at recruiting a diverse staff, and matching their pupils to same-race teachers, and that is showing up in higher achievement.

3. Helping teachers maintain high expectations for all students, regardless of race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic background. This is right in line with education reform dogma going back a generation, encapsulated by President George W. Bush’s call to end the “soft bigotry of low expectations.” Simply put, it’s racist to expect less from Black children and other children of color. (That’s a message that some “antiracism” advocates need to hear, too.) It’s also un-American. This is one of the primary motivations for statewide academic standards and uniform assessments. A high-quality curriculum can be extremely helpful here, too, as it articulates what high expectations look like in daily practice. We must also pay attention to grading practices and to the subtle messages that educators send to their students.

4. Teaching students to empathize with and understand others, especially those whose lives are more difficult than their own. This, too, is scarcely new. It’s part of “social and emotional learning,” or what others call “character education,” and has been part of great schooling since ancient times. But there’s a case to be made that, given America’s growing diversity and inequalities, it’s more important than ever for children to appreciate that some kids have it much harder than they do. And in particular, that many Black Americans face particular challenges because of racism that their fellow Americans need to better acknowledge and understand. We also need to help students learn to listen to each other, and engage with views from across the ideological spectrum—essential objectives for high-quality civics programs.

5. Presenting the history of slavery, Jim Crow, and other painful chapters in an honest, unflinching way. Everyone should want all American children to know the evils of those institutions, given how at odds they were with the principles of our founding as well as our current aspirations. This isn’t reinventing the past on the basis of today’s values. It’s correcting efforts to sugarcoat the horrors of those chapters in American history. Of course, instructional materials and methods should be age-appropriate. But nowhere in the United States should these topics be avoided. Nor should we fail to teach the significant progress that we’ve made on these and other fronts. Instead, we should aim for an approach to teaching history that is both critical and patriotic.

This list covers quite a lot of territory. It is congruent with the education reform movement of the past several decades, and I don’t see it as ideological, even as I recognize that some aspects will appeal more to progressives and some more to conservatives. Some should even appeal to the advocates on either side of this issue! Importantly, it avoids both mandates and bans on how schools should address these topics. In a big, diverse country, we should allow schools to figure out the best path forward, especially schools that parents themselves have chosen.

At the same time, let’s not let our solutions to old problems cause new ones. Most importantly, nobody should be demonized because of their race, and schools should never seek to indoctrinate their students. About that, the conservative critics are right.

Still, for education leaders that want to advance a positive agenda without alienating parents, teachers, and students, these five actions—embracing culturally affirming instructional materials; diversifying the teaching profession; maintaining high expectations for all students; teaching students empathy; and presenting American history in a manner that is both critical and patriotic—present a path forward. They sure beat fighting each other into oblivion.

Michael J. Petrilli is president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, visiting fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, and an executive editor of Education Next.

This post originally appeared on the Fordham Institute’s Flypaper blog.

The post The Common Ground on Race and Education That’s Hiding in Plain Sight appeared first on Education Next.

[NDN/ccn/comedia Links]

News.... browse around here


Horrific story of the week: https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2263187828795/parents-sentenced-in-fentanyl-death-of-2-year-old


check here


Vaccine Ingredient SM-102 Is Safe

SciCheck Digest

The COVID-19 vaccine from Moderna uses an ingredient called SM-102 to deliver the mRNA that carries instructions for how to develop antibodies against the novel coronavirus. A widely shared video is now spreading the falsehood that SM-102 is harmful, but the warning label it shows is for chloroform, not SM-102.




Full Story

The COVID-19 vaccine from Moderna — which has been administered more than 121 million times since the Food and Drug Administration granted it an emergency use authorization in December — includes 10 ingredients.

A widely circulating claim has seized on one of those ingredients to mislead people into believing that the vaccine is unsafe.

Moderna’s vaccine underwent clinical trials — with about 30,000 volunteers in its third phase — that were overseen by an independent data and safety monitoring board. The results were reviewed not only by the FDA, but also by an outside panel of experts advising the agency, as we’ve explained. Another independent group, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, also reviewed the data and recommended use of the vaccine.

Despite that, a video posted to TikTok on May 14 is spreading the false claim that SM-102, an ingredient in Moderna’s vaccine, is harmful. That video has amassed more than a million views and migrated to Instagram, where it has racked up even more views.

Misinformation peddlers with large followings — including Alex Jones and Mike Adams — have also picked up the claim and boosted its visibility.

They’ve added a veneer of government secrecy, too. Both Jones and Adams falsely claimed that the state of Connecticut revealed previously withheld information that the vaccine contains a “deadly” ingredient. But what they point to is a state Department of Health fact sheet on vaccine ingredients – which has been publicly available since the Moderna vaccine was granted an EUA in December. There has been no recent revelation about a secret ingredient.

The viral TikTok video doesn’t use the Connecticut example; it just shows the website for a health care network in New Jersey that posted an article about the vaccine ingredients in January.

All of the videos and posts focus on the same ingredient, though — SM-102, which is a lipid, a fatty molecule that doesn’t dissolve in water. We’ll explain more about it below.

The only evidence offered to support the false claim that SM-102 is dangerous is a misrepresentation of the website for a company called Cayman Chemical, which sells scientific research materials.

Cayman Chemical offers a version of SM-102 for research purposes that is packaged in chloroform, a potentially toxic chemical. So the safety data sheet from Cayman Chemical for that product includes warnings related to chloroform — not SM-102.

But both Jones and the viral TikTok video present that sheet as though the warnings are related to SM-102.

Jones, for example, said in his video, “Let’s go ahead and read over what this thing does.” He then flashed the safety data sheet across the screen and read: “Suspected of causing cancer; suspected of damaging fertility and the unborn child; causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure.”

He concludes, “They want you to take two shots of this and then recurring booster shots.”

But, as we said, those warnings are for chloroform — the same list of hazards is included on the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s entry for that chemical.

The center lists no hazards for SM-102.

Chloroform is not an ingredient in Moderna’s vaccine.

Cayman Chemical explained in a press release that the product featured in these videos and posts is from its division that makes compounds for research use only. The company has a separate division that makes active pharmaceutical ingredients for human and veterinary use, which have to comply with strict guidelines from the FDA.

The safety data sheet shown in the videos “accurately represents that the mixture of chemicals in the product are 90% chloroform (a common solvent) and 10% SM-102. While it is a common solvent, chloroform has several known serious hazards, which have been included on Cayman’s [safety data sheet],” the press release said.

“Neither the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS), or the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Classification and Labelling Inventory list any hazards associated with SM-102,” the release also said.

SM-102 is a type of lipid, Dr. Lee Riley, chair of the Division of Infectious Disease and Vaccinology at the University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health, explained in a phone interview with FactCheck.org. Moderna’s vaccine uses it as a fatty bubble, a delivery vehicle, for messenger RNA, which gives instructions to cells on how to make antibodies for the virus that causes COVID-19.

“RNA on its own (naked RNA) is highly prone to being chewed up and falling apart,” Joshua Andersen, associate professor of biochemistry at Brigham Young University, said in an email to FactCheck.org. “The only way these RNA vaccines ever stood a chance is if the RNA could somehow be stabilized. So these lipids serve as a carrier and stabilizer of the RNA in the vaccine.”

“Imagine a small bubble (made of lipids) containing the RNA that helps deliver it to our cells,” he said.

The TikTok video misleadingly highlighted part of Cayman Chemical’s safety sheet that said its version of SM-102 for research was not meant for “human or veterinary use.” But that version is not a vaccine ingredient. Andersen explained that “the ‘not for human consumption’ issue has to do with the fact that this version of SM-102 is not formulated for human consumption. This particular formulation is designated ‘research use only’ (ROU) because it’s in chloroform and it’s not purified to the standard needed for human consumption. We have super stringent standards for making something consumable, which really should be confidence inspiring to vaccine skeptics.”

So, the product used in the social media posts is not the same one that is used in the vaccine — and the warning labels they show are for a different chemical that’s not included in the vaccine.

In addition to the claim about SM-102, Jones also repeated some other claims in his video that we’ve recently debunked. We’ll list them here:

  • Jones claimed that nearly half of the workers at the National Institutes of Health and the CDC haven’t taken the vaccine “because they know it’s experimental, it’s not really a vaccine.” But, as we wrote, federal health officials estimated at a Senate hearing that so far about 60% of their employees have been vaccinated. They didn’t say anyone had refused to get vaccinated.
  • Jones showed a clip of a nurse fainting after she received the vaccine and said, “folks are getting sick, collapsing.” But as we explained before, that clip was selectively edited from a news report to show the nurse fainting. It didn’t show her quick recovery afterward, when she explained that she is prone to fainting when triggered by even a slight pain.
  • Jones also suggested that the vaccine is part of Bill Gates’ plan to “depopulate the earth.” In a 2010 TED Talk focused on developing new technologies to drastically reduce carbon dioxide emissions, Gates briefly mentioned reducing the rate of population growth. As we explained, a conspiratorial video misleadingly edited Gates’ talk to suggest his “wish” was to depopulate the planet through vaccines.

For more information on the Moderna vaccine, see SciCheck’s article: “A Guide to Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine.”

Editor’s note: SciCheck’s COVID-19/Vaccination Project is made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The foundation has no control over our editorial decisions, and the views expressed in our articles do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation. The goal of the project is to increase exposure to accurate information about COVID-19 and vaccines, while decreasing the impact of misinformation.

Sources

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Press release. “FDA Takes Additional Action in Fight Against COVID-19 By Issuing Emergency Use Authorization for Second COVID-19 Vaccine.” 18 Dec 2020.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine EUA Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers. Revised 6 Mar 2021.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ Interim Recommendation for Use of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine — United States, December 2020. 20 Dec 2020.

Connecticut Department of Public Health. “What Ingredients are in the COVID-19 Vaccine?” 4 Feb 2021.

Hackensack Meridian Health. “A Simple Breakdown of the Ingredients in the COVID Vaccines.” 11 Jan 2021.

Cayman Chemical. Safety data sheet. Article number: 33474. 11 Apr 2021.

National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine. Compound summary: Chloroform. Updated 22 May 2021.

National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine. Compound summary: SM-102. Updated 22 May 2021.

Cayman Chemical. Press release. “SM-102 for Research Use Only (RUO).” 19 May 2021.

Riley, Lee. Chair of the Division of Infectious Disease and Vaccinology, University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health. Telephone interview. 20 May 2021.

Andersen, Joshua. Associate Professor of Biochemistry, Brigham Young University. Email response. 20 May 2021.

Jones, Brea. “Posts Distort Testimony of Federal Health Officials on Employee Vaccinations.” FactCheck.org. 21 May 2021.

Hale Spencer, Saranac. “Anti-Vaccine Posts Use Deceptively Edited Video Clip.” FactCheck.org. Updated 4 Jan 2021.

Fichera, Angelo. “Video Targets Gates With Old Clip, Misleading Edit.” FactCheck.org. 5 Mar 2021.

The post Vaccine Ingredient SM-102 Is Safe appeared first on FactCheck.org.

News and Views: https://thecherrycreeknews.com/

News…. browse around here

Horrific story of the week: https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2263187828795/parents-sentenced-in-fentanyl-death-of-2-year-old

check over here

Description
Due to the unprecedented crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, BRIO has dedicated 100% of their operations to importing critically needed respirator masks. Featuring a 3D comfort design, these KN95 masks provide filtration against particulate pollution, gases, as well as bacteria, viruses, and most odors. It's made with comfortable stretch fabric and has convenient earloops for a tight fit. These masks are perfect for everyday wear. Order your 5-Pack now!
  • 3D Comfort mask design
  • Convenient earloop design
  • Comfortable stretch fabric for tight fit
  • Easy to put on & remove
Note: These masks are not FDA approved nor are they N95. These masks are tested to meet the standards for Chinese KN-95. Tests confirmed almost 90% of particulate pollution, bacteria and viruses were successfully filtered when the mask was used. 20x more effective than cloth masks.
Specs
  • Color: white
  • Materials: 3-layer melt-blown non-woven PPE
  • Product dimensions: 1"H x 8"L x 5"W
  • 3D Comfort design
  • KN95 PRC Standard (Similar to NIOSH N95)
  • CE 0194
  • FFP2 - EN149 Filtration Level

News.... browse around here


Horrific story of the week: https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2263187828795/parents-sentenced-in-fentanyl-death-of-2-year-old


check out this site

Are senior civil servants really as fortunate as they were 50 years back?

“The class composition of the senior ranks of the civil service has barely changed since 1967, research reveals.”

The Guardian, 20 May 2021.

“Senior civil servants are as privileged today as 50 years ago, with fewer than one in five coming from a working-class background, a report backed by the government has concluded.”

The Times, 20 May 2021.

“Almost three-quarters (72%) of those in senior posts are from privileged homes, up from two-thirds (67%) in 1967.”

BBC News, 20 May 2021.

A recent report from the government’s Social Mobility Commission has received a lot of media attention for its finding that the Senior Civil Service (SCS) is essentially as privileged as it was back in 1967, the last time such a study was undertaken.

One of the key findings to support that conclusion, appearing on the first page of the report, is that, in 1967, 19% of the SCS staff were from low socioeconomic backgrounds, while in 2019 it was 18%. 

But, since 1967, society has changed a lot, and the group categorised as being in the lower socioeconomic class is much smaller than it was, now accounting for around 37% of UK workers. So while the class background of SCS workers hasn’t changed much, nowadays it much more closely matches the class background of the public more generally (though it still overrepresents people from the high socioeconomic group and underrepresents people from the low socioeconomic group).

The socioeconomic groupings are also worth looking at in detail. Throughout the media reporting and the report itself, people from a high socioeconomic background are described, variously, as “advantaged” or “privileged” but the group is less exclusive than it might sound.

It includes people such as the children of chief executives and solicitors, but also the children of teachers, nurses and social workers, who might not be assumed to come from a “privileged” background. 

In comparison, professions counted as being from a low socioeconomic background include plumbers, electricians, bar and waiting staff and sales assistants, while jobs such as secretaries, call centre agents and small business owners are counted as “intermediary”. 

Using another measure of privilege, the report notes that 25% of the SCS, and 59% of permanent secretaries (the heads of government departments), attended an independent school. Back in 1967, their representation in the SCS was much higher at around 37%. 

By contrast, 7% of school pupils in England are currently at an independent school which has remained roughly the same since 1967. 

This suggests SCS employees are still more likely to come from a privileged background than average, but less so than was the case 50 years ago.

Stay informed: https://www.thecherrycreeknews.com/

News…. browse around here

check out your url

Description
Due to the unprecedented crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, BRIO has dedicated 100% of their operations to importing critically needed respirator masks. Featuring a 3D comfort design, these KN95 masks provide filtration against particulate pollution, gases, as well as bacteria, viruses, and most odors. It's made with comfortable stretch fabric and has convenient earloops for a tight fit. These masks are perfect for everyday wear. Order your 5-Pack now!
  • 3D Comfort mask design
  • Convenient earloop design
  • Comfortable stretch fabric for tight fit
  • Easy to put on & remove
Note: These masks are not FDA approved nor are they N95. These masks are tested to meet the standards for Chinese KN-95. Tests confirmed almost 90% of particulate pollution, bacteria and viruses were successfully filtered when the mask was used. 20x more effective than cloth masks.
Specs
  • Color: white
  • Materials: 3-layer melt-blown non-woven PPE
  • Product dimensions: 1"H x 8"L x 5"W
  • 3D Comfort design
  • KN95 PRC Standard (Similar to NIOSH N95)
  • CE 0194
  • FFP2 - EN149 Filtration Level

News.... browse around here



check out here

Wednesday, May 26, 2021

White House Principal Deputy Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre


White House Principal Deputy Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on being first Black woman to do White House Press Briefing in 30 years: "I appreciate the historic nature...I believe that being behind this podium, being in this room, being in this bu […]
Read More

Nick Offerman testifies on COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence


Nick Offerman testifies on COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence: "I urge anyone who has not yet been vaccinated to catch my enthusiasm...Medicine doesn't care who you voted for. We amazing humans have created a vaccine that serves the common good. The vaccine […]
Read More

Offer a child a publication, or show her to read?

A first grader picks out a book he would like to check out at the Post Road Elementary School Library, Thursday, Oct. 1, 2020, in White Plains, N.Y.

Give a child a book, or teach her to read? The question sounds philosophical, even biblical. It was raised in a recent Boston Globe editorial about how Boston should use more than $400 million in new federal funding for schools.

School leaders and communities planning to use this one-time windfall face a tension: invest now to create value after the money is gone, or spend now to address the urgent needs of unfinished learning.

Two ideas mentioned in the Globe editorial highlight the two possible approaches: building in-school libraries (offered by Superintendent Brenda Cassellius) and tutoring.

For a similar cost, you get two very different things.

Capital costs for libraries are pretty clear — you have to buy books, and you need to outfit a room with shelves, furniture, tracking systems.  Let’s call it $500,000.

The operating costs are significant.  There is the obvious need for a librarian, with an average salary of over $100,000 and about $30,000 for benefits.  But you also have to account for the loss of a classroom — in a typical Boston Public Schools elementary school, that means 20 fewer students at about $6,000 a pupil passed along by the district.  Altogether, it costs the school about a quarter of million dollars to run the library every year.

An average Boston Public Schools elementary school has at least 12 classes; many have more.  With a standard school day, that means about two library periods per week for each class.

So, what do you get?  For about $1.25M over the next three years, each kid gets to visit a library for about 70 hours per year (and you keep paying for it after).

Now let’s take the case of tutoring, using the same elementary school example.  An Americorps tutor costs a school or school district about $18,000.  Throw in a coordinator or non-profit to help ($100,000/year), perhaps invest in training the tutors in reading remediation (like Orton-Gillingham) for about $3,000 each tutor.

So, what do you get?  For about $1.25M over the next three years, a school could provide about 1,500 hours of reading tutoring per year (but it goes away after that).

Which is more valuable?

There can be arguments on both sides of this, but there shouldn’t be an argument about who should decide: principals, teachers, families, and students.  This is not a policy position, it’s a practical solution. The people with the most information will make the best decisions. They know what their buildings, educators, and kids need.

It was encouraging that during a recent meeting of the commission set up to decide how to use these funds, the Boston Public Schools committed to at least 50 percent of the federal dollars being allocated to schools and school-based planning.  It was confusing that the documents released publicly after the meeting were different, including the removal of the graph indicating this commitment to schools.

There is no shortage of good ideas on how to spend this once-in-a-generation funding opportunity.

But this money will only meet its intended purpose if those good ideas are centered in schools.

Will Austin is the founder and chief executive officer of Boston Schools Fund.

The post Give a child a book, or teach her to read? appeared first on Education Next.

[NDN/ccn/comedia Links]

News.... browse around here



check over here


The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 not chloroform

A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance.  

The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website. 

The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others. 

Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance. 

The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet. 

Similar claims have also been fact checked by PolitiFact.

What is SM-102 and does the Moderna vaccine use it?

The Moderna vaccine’s active ingredient is a piece of genetic material called mRNA which is essentially the instruction to make the spike proteins found on the surface of the virus that causes Covid-19. Once these are made, this then triggers an immune response to those proteins, which protects the body against the real virus.

SM-102 is a lipid molecule used to form the nanoparticle which carries the mRNA in the Moderna vaccine to cells in the body. The Pfizer vaccine uses different lipid molecules for this purpose. 

Although SM-102 is used in the Moderna vaccine, the vaccine does not contain chloroform and it is not listed in the vaccine’s ingredients. 

Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine was given regulatory approval for use in the UK in January 2021. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said “all COVID-19 vaccines are continually monitored by the MHRA. This ensures that the benefits in protecting people against COVID-19 continue to far outweigh any potential side-effects.” 

The MHRA told Full Fact “The manufacture for the SM-102 is controlled and agreed specifications have to be met before it can be used in the lipid nanoparticles for the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.”  

The MHRA also added: “We are not aware of any reason for specific concerns with the safety of SM-102.

“Chloroform is not used in the manufacture of SM-102 for this vaccine.”

News and Views: https://www.northdenvernews.com

News…. browse around here

check out this site

Description
Due to the unprecedented crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, BRIO has dedicated 100% of their operations to importing critically needed respirator masks. Featuring a 3D comfort design, these KN95 masks provide filtration against particulate pollution, gases, as well as bacteria, viruses, and most odors. It's made with comfortable stretch fabric and has convenient earloops for a tight fit. These masks are perfect for everyday wear. Order your 5-Pack now!
  • 3D Comfort mask design
  • Convenient earloop design
  • Comfortable stretch fabric for tight fit
  • Easy to put on & remove
Note: These masks are not FDA approved nor are they N95. These masks are tested to meet the standards for Chinese KN-95. Tests confirmed almost 90% of particulate pollution, bacteria and viruses were successfully filtered when the mask was used. 20x more effective than cloth masks.
Specs
  • Color: white
  • Materials: 3-layer melt-blown non-woven PPE
  • Product dimensions: 1"H x 8"L x 5"W
  • 3D Comfort design
  • KN95 PRC Standard (Similar to NIOSH N95)
  • CE 0194
  • FFP2 - EN149 Filtration Level

News.... browse around here



check out your url